Comparison of CFRP and alternative seismic retrofitting techniques for bare and infilled RC frames

Abstract

The opportunities provided by the use of modern repair schemes for the seismic retrofit of existing RC structures were assessed on a comparative experimental study of carbon fiber-reinforced polymer (CFRP) and more-conventional seismic retrofitting techniques for the repair of reinforced concrete members and masonry walls of bare and infilled RC frames, respectively, damaged because of cyclic loading. Four 1-story, one-bay, one-third-scale frame specimens are tested under cyclic horizontal loading up to a drift level of 4%—two bare frames with spirals or stirrups as shear reinforcement, respectively, and two infilled frames with weak infills and spirals or stirrups as shear reinforcement, respectively. The applied repair techniques are mainly based on the use of thin epoxy resin infused under pressure into the crack system of the damaged RC joint bodies or on the additional use of CFRP plates to the surfaces of the damaged structural RC members as external reinforcement and the use of a polymer modified cement mortar or two-sided diagonal CFRP fabrics for the damaged infill masonry walls. After repair, specimens were retested in the same way. Conclusions concerning the comparison of the effectiveness between conventional and CFRP seismic retrofitting applied techniques on the basis of maximum cycles load, loading stiffness, and hysteretic energy absorption capabilities of the tested specimens are drawn.